AI Deck

Browserbase — Cloud browser infrastructure that gives AI agents a real browser, launching thousands of sessions instantly with CAPTCHA and proxy handling built in

A cloud-based headless browser platform that lets AI agents operate the web the way a person does. It has been offered by Browserbase, Inc. (United States) since 2024. Instead of running your own browser servers, you call an API and get a real Chrome session, and you can run thousands of browsers at once. It connects to existing automation frameworks — Playwright, Puppeteer, and Selenium — so you can migrate by simply pointing your current scripts at a remote endpoint. The platform takes over the most painful parts of web automation: automatic CAPTCHA solving, proxy management, stealth mode, and session recording.

Key Features

  • Drop-in support for existing frameworks: Works with Playwright, Puppeteer, and Selenium. Instead of launching a browser locally, you connect to a remote session, so existing automation code needs almost no rewriting
  • Automatic CAPTCHA solving and proxies: Paid plans include automatic CAPTCHA solving as standard, and each plan bundles a set amount of residential proxy bandwidth. You no longer need to hand-build workarounds for the steps that trip bot detection
  • Stealth mode and session persistence: Stealth mode adjusts the browser fingerprint to reduce detection, and login state (cookies and sessions) can be preserved and reused in later runs
  • Live view and session recording: You can watch a running browser in real time, and replay recordings and logs after a run finishes. Being able to see exactly where an agent stalled cuts debugging effort substantially
  • Stagehand for AI browser automation: The company’s open-source automation framework. Rather than writing CSS selectors, you can mix natural-language instructions such as “click the login button” with conventional code
  • Search / Fetch APIs and a model gateway: The same platform offers a web search API built for agents, a Fetch API that converts URLs into HTML, JSON, or Markdown, and a model gateway that lets you call multiple AI models through a single key
  • MCP support: Browser control can be invoked directly from AI assistants over the Model Context Protocol, so it can be wired into Claude and other MCP-capable clients

Pricing

PlanMonthly priceConcurrent browsersIncluded browser hoursHighlights
Free$031 hour15-minute session limit, 1,000 search and 1,000 fetch calls, 7-day data retention
Developer$2025100 hours (then $0.12/hour)Automatic CAPTCHA solving, 1 GB proxies (then $12/GB)
Startup$99100500 hours (then $0.10/hour)5 GB proxies (then $10/GB), 10,000 fetch calls, 30-day data retention
ScaleContact sales250+Usage-basedAdvanced stealth mode, enterprise options such as HIPAA (BAA), DPA, and SSO

Browser hours, proxy bandwidth, API calls, and model tokens are all usage-based, with anything beyond the included amount billed on top. A sensible approach is to confirm the behavior you need on the Free plan, then pick a tier by working backward from the concurrency you require.

Pricing is current as of August 2026. Please check the official site for the latest information.

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Fully outsources browser infrastructure work — servers, dependencies, memory leaks, and scaling
  • Existing Playwright and Puppeteer code can be migrated with minimal changes
  • CAPTCHA solving, proxies, and stealth — the areas that turn into a swamp when built in-house — come as standard
  • Live view and session recording let you trace what a failing agent actually did
  • A free plan is available, so small-scale validation costs nothing

⚠️ Cons

  • Cloud-only; there is no self-hosting option
  • Billing spans browser hours, proxies, API calls, and model tokens, which makes monthly costs hard to forecast
  • The free plan’s 1 browser hour and 15-minute session cap make it a trial allowance rather than something you can run on
  • Heavy workloads such as large-scale scraping can accumulate usage charges quickly
  • Respecting a target site’s terms of service and robots.txt remains the user’s responsibility; the platform does not take that on for you

Comparison with Similar Services

CriteriaBrowserbaseBrowserlessSteel.devHyperbrowser
PositioningBrowser infrastructure for AI agentsLong-established headless browser serviceOpen-source browser APILightweight, agent-focused platform
Self-hostingNot available (cloud only)AvailableAvailableNot available
Framework supportPlaywright / Puppeteer / SeleniumPlaywright / Puppeteer and othersPlaywright / PuppeteerPlaywright / Puppeteer
Distinctive strengthStagehand, Search / Fetch APIs, observability toolingTrack record and breadth of protocol supportOpen source, high flexibilityEmphasis on anonymity and concurrency
Free tierYesYesYesYes

Because each vendor structures pricing differently, side-by-side numbers are hard to compare. In practice, narrowing the choice by three questions — required concurrency, whether you need self-hosting, and whether you bring your own proxies — is the more workable approach.

Who Is It For

  • Developers writing automation in Playwright or Puppeteer who are losing time to server operations and scaling
  • Teams building AI agents that browse and operate the web without wanting to assemble browser infrastructure from scratch
  • Anyone whose automation keeps breaking against CAPTCHAs and bot detection
  • Products already in the operations phase that need to trace agent failures through recordings and logs
  • People who want to drive a browser directly from an MCP-capable client

Summary

Browserbase answers the question of where browsers should run in the age of AI agents. Existing automation frameworks work as-is, and CAPTCHA handling, proxies, stealth, and observability all arrive as one package, so the time saved compared with building your own is considerable. The trade-offs are that it is cloud-only and that its many usage-based line items make costs hard to read. The dependable path is to confirm on the free plan that your use case runs reliably, then choose a paid tier once you know the concurrency you actually need.

← Blog