Awesome MCP Servers is a directory site where you can search for MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that connect AI agents to external services, together with Agent Skills. Run by the developer wong2, this community-driven catalog lists both official servers published by companies such as Anthropic and community-built servers, organized under “Featured,” “Official,” “Latest,” and topic categories. According to the site, more than 9,800 servers were listed as of August 2026. A GitHub repository of the same name (MIT licensed) exists as a mirror and has collected roughly 4,300 stars.
Once you start using an MCP-capable client (Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code, Codex, and so on), you will inevitably want to check whether someone has already built a server for the task you want to automate. Awesome MCP Servers serves as that entry point.
Key Features
- Coverage spanning official and community servers: Official servers maintained by companies (marked with 🌟 on the site) and community servers published by individuals are shown side by side for comparison. Because it is not tied to a single vendor, you are less likely to miss options
- Three entry points plus category filters: In addition to the three axes of “Featured” (by prominence), “Official” (by provenance), and “Latest” (by recency), you can narrow down by categories such as development, productivity, database, search, web scraping, file system, version control, communication, cloud services, storage, marketing, finance, design, and memory
- Topic guides by use case: Dedicated pages collect candidate servers for common use cases such as browser automation, web scraping, RAG, OpenAPI, PDF handling, and coding agents. These suit the stage where you do not yet know what to use
- Agent Skills library: Separately from MCP servers, there is a section gathering Agent Skills (packaged work procedures) usable with Claude Code, Cursor, and others, where official and community skills can be browsed by category. Being able to look for both MCP servers and skills in one place is what distinguishes it from other listing sites
- Separation of the GitHub mirror and the submission process: The GitHub repository is positioned as a mirror of the listing and does not accept pull requests. To get listed, you submit through the form on the website instead
Pricing
| Plan | Price | What it covers |
|---|---|---|
| Browsing and search | Free | Browsing the directory, filtering by category and topic, using the Agent Skills library |
| Standard submission | Free | Submit the server name, description, GitHub/documentation link, category, and contact address; listed after review by the operator |
| Premium Submit | $39 (one-time) | Expedited review, an official badge, and a dofollow link |
Pricing is current as of August 2026. Please check the official submission page for the latest pricing.
There is no cost for users who are simply looking for servers. The paid option is a listing option aimed at developers who want their own MCP server published on the site.
Pros & Cons
✅ Pros
- The large number of listings makes it easy to use as a first step when looking for MCP servers
- Official servers are clearly marked, so you can restrict yourself to entries with clear provenance
- Topic guides let you work backwards from your goal
- MCP servers and Agent Skills can be found on the same site
- No account or login is needed for browsing, so you can start researching immediately
⚠️ Cons
- With so many listings, quality varies widely. Community servers may include ones that are no longer maintained, so you need to check the GitHub update date and issue activity yourself
- Because a paid priority-listing option exists, top placement or a “badge” should not be read as a guarantee of quality
- Listing information is submission-based and does not amount to verification that a server actually works
- Since pull requests cannot be sent to the GitHub side, you cannot directly correct errors in the listing
- There is little official explanation of who operates it or how often it is updated, so the freshness of information has to be judged case by case
Comparison with Similar Services
| Item | Awesome MCP Servers | Official MCP Registry | Smithery | PulseMCP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positioning | Community-run cross-cutting directory | Official registry provided on the protocol side | Registry oriented toward hosting and connection support | Listing site strong on new arrivals and use cases |
| Agent Skills | Dedicated library | Out of scope | ─ | ─ |
| Listing route | Submission via web form | Registration following the specification | Developer registration | Collected and listed |
| Paid option | Premium Submit (for the listing side) | None | Depends on the service’s own pricing | ─ |
| Browsing cost | Free | Free | Free | Free |
All of them share the goal of “finding MCP servers,” but each has its own strength: Awesome MCP Servers in the sheer number of listings and in covering Agent Skills as well, the official registry in the certainty of provenance, and hosting-oriented registries in how few steps it takes to get running. Rather than settling on one, it is realistic to use them together depending on your purpose.
Who Is It For
- People who have just started using MCP with Claude Code or Cursor and first want to grasp what exists
- People who want to work backwards from a use case, such as “I want to handle PDFs” or “I want it to operate a browser”
- Teams that want to pick only officially provided servers and integrate them safely into a work environment
- Developers who build and publish their own MCP servers or Agent Skills and want more entry points for people to find them
- People who want to keep an eye on which kinds of servers are growing in the MCP ecosystem
Summary
Awesome MCP Servers is a community-run directory that gives you an overview of the rapidly growing world of MCP servers and Agent Skills. Thanks to the number of listings and the organization by category and topic, it is a strong option when your goal is to understand what is available. At the same time, listings are submission-based and a paid priority option exists, so it is important not to treat being listed as a guarantee of quality. When you find a server that interests you, a two-step approach works well: check the linked GitHub repository for update activity, issues, and license before adopting it.